A discussion of the "fine points" of directing and informing between an INFP and an INFJ:

INFP:
I most tend to appreciate directing styles in certain situations and informing styles in others--home versus work, for example. I like it when people say what they mean and mean what they say when the time calls for it, and I appreciate having information given to me in an informing style when the topic is an opinion or choice, like if it is a request.

INFJ:
Well, extra information is OK if something is a request (we can combine our styles and say, 'Wow, this is heavy! Could you give me a hand?' or 'There's plenty of food in the dish -- would you like some more?"). But I hate it when I'm given information and I don't know if a request has been made -- and that's what happens, sometimes, with the informing style. I feel as if I'm supposed to be a mind-reader.  Sometimes I know what's implied, sometimes I don't -- and sometimes I don't even realise that there IS an implication.

INFP:
I have problems in work situations when people give requests in informing style when the response expected is not based on a choice (example: "you might want to think about doing xyz" when the person really means "do x or else!").

INFJ:
But 'You might want to think about this' is fairly directive, though.  It's a sort of diplomatic way of saying 'do it or else', particularly if the person is a boss -- at least it's obvious what they mean. An informing style would be more like 'This needs to be done'.

INFP:
I don't like to be around people who bark out orders either, under any circumstance, or have little negotiating skills when dealing with people.

INFJ:
Well no, nor do I. But at least you know where you stand. If someone barks out orders I would normally refuse on principle to do what I was asked... but then my style is directive so I have no problems understanding an apparent order as being a way of communicating that I have a choice.